Aptitude of the average person to decode conversational implicature of emotional prosody has been found to be slightly less accurate than traditional facial expression discrimination ability; however, specific ability to decode varies by emotion.
2.
A conversational implicature is said to be " non-detachable " when, after the replacement of what is said with another expression with the same literal meaning, the same conversational implicature remains.
3.
A conversational implicature is said to be " non-detachable " when, after the replacement of what is said with another expression with the same literal meaning, the same conversational implicature remains.
4.
Given that a speaker means a given proposition " p " by a given utterance, Grice suggests several features which " p " must possess in order to count as a conversational implicature.
5.
Perhaps Grice's best-known example of conversational implicature is the case of the reference letter, a " quantity implicature " ( i . e ., because it involves flouting the first maxim of Quantity ):
6.
Some logicians, such as Paul Grice, have used conversational implicature to argue that, despite apparent difficulties, the material conditional is just fine as a translation for the natural language'if . . . then . . . '.
7.
"' Calculability : "'" The presence of a conversational implicature must be capable of being worked out; for even if it can in fact be intuitively grasped, unless the intuition is replaceable by an argument, the implicature ( if present at all ) will not count as a conversational implicature; it will be a conventional implicature ."
8.
"' Calculability : "'" The presence of a conversational implicature must be capable of being worked out; for even if it can in fact be intuitively grasped, unless the intuition is replaceable by an argument, the implicature ( if present at all ) will not count as a conversational implicature; it will be a conventional implicature ."
9.
"' Cancelability : "'" . . . a putative conversational implicature is explicitly cancelable if, to the form of words the utterance of which putatively implicates that " p ", it is admissible to add " but not p ", or " I do not mean to imply that p ", and it is contextually cancelable if one can find situations in which the utterance of the form of words would simply not carry the implicature ."
मोबाइल